Do Autistics Tell Lies

On Being Governed By Scientific Frauds

But don't worry.  Anybody can blow a college course and still bounce back.  A lot of us get it wrong the first time.  Unfortunately, Al Gore didn't fix his failure.  He made it much worse by peddling monstrous pseudo-science and getting even richer from it.  As well as repulsively fat -- a walking metaphor for his politics. The more I think about it, the more it looks like global warming is a deliberate attack by the postmodern (anti-science) left on science.  Global Frauding attacks all the core scientific values -- of truth-telling, empirical discipline, and skepticism.  Our bulging Goracle gets a lifetime grade of F for setting real science back by decades. Nothing is as toxic as a really bad idea.  Hundreds of millions of dollars are still being spent in "scientific" pursuit of disaster scenarios about the earth, fiddling with infinitely variable computer models.  This isn't science; the burden of proof has flipped to the skeptics, which does not happen in real science.  Albert Einstein had to predict observable outcomes before his ideas were accepted.  Watson and Crick had to prove the helical structure of DNA before anybody took them seriously.  But in Global Frauding it's the skeptics who are supposed to prove that the latest computer model is not No real scientist makes a deal with Al Gore and the New York Times to get rich by peddling end-of-the-world stories.  No scientist is then allowed to call those planted lies "scientific truths" until somebody can prove they're wrong.  If science worked like that, Galileo would still be a pariah and the Vatican would be telling us about Ptolemaic astronomy.  In real science the burden of proof is on the proposer.  There are good reasons for that standard. became famous for his discovery of "chaotic dynamics" in weather data.  Scientific theorists are still building on that breakthrough.